Some say the self is the cause of suffering. Others say planets are the cause of suffering. Others say karma is the cause. Others say the inherent property of matter is the cause. 


Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!



ЗНАЕТЕ ЛИ ВЫ?

Some say the self is the cause of suffering. Others say planets are the cause of suffering. Others say karma is the cause. Others say the inherent property of matter is the cause.

Поиск

TRANSLATION

Some say the self is the cause of suffering. Others say planets are the cause of suffering. Others say karma is the cause. Others say the inherent property of matter is the cause.

COMMENTARY

Here the different opinions are described. Some, the yogīs, who cover up (vasanā) the difference (vikalpa) say the soul, master of the self, gives happiness and suffering. The Gītā (6.5) says ātmaiva hy ātmano bandhur ātmaiva ripur ātmana: the ātmā itself is the friend of the soul and the enemy of the soul. Or the meaning can be: some, the advaitins, who say that the jīva and the lord become one say that the ātmā is the source of happiness and suffering. They also say that devatās cannot be the cause since they are controlled by karma as well, and karma cannot be the cause because it is not independent. Thus only the ātmā is the cause and nothing else. Others, those who believe in planets controlled by devatās, say that planets are the cause. The Mīmāṁsakas say that karma is the cause. Others, the Lokāyatas, say that svabhāva, the inherent property of matter, is the cause.

|| 1.17.20 ||

apratarkyād anirdeśyād iti keṣv api niścayaḥ |

atrānurūpaṁ rājarṣe vimṛśa sva-manīṣayā ||

 

TRANSLATION

And among these, some ascertain that happiness and distress come from that which is beyond reason and perception, O sage among kings! Consider the proper truth by your intelligence.

 

COMMENTARY

The Vaiṣṇavas ascertain that the happiness and suffering come from the Supreme Lord who cannot be determined by designations. Śruti says tvad-avagamī na vetti bhavad-uttha-śubhāśubhayor guṇa-viguṇānvayān: One who knows you cannot understand your connection with good and bad qualities which give auspiciousness and inauspiciousness.

 

sukhaṁ duḥkhaṁ bhavo ’bhāvo bhayaṁ cābhayam eva ca

ahiṁsā samatā tuṣṭis tapo dānaṁ yaśo ’yaśaḥ

bhavanti bhāvā bhūtānāṁ matta eva pṛthag-vidhāḥ

 

Pleasure, pain, birth, death, fear, fearlessness, non-violence, equanimity, satisfaction, austerity, charity, fame, infamy--all these various states of the living beings arise only from Me. BG 10.4-5

 

“But why should it be impossible to designate the Lord as the cause?” From seeing people’s suffering arising from time, karma, property of matter, planets, ghosts, kings, snakes and sickness, even those things cannot be determined as the cause since in reality, those causes are not independent. Everything arises from the Lord. But it is improper for the worshippers to say that the Lord is the cause of happiness and distress.

 

“But like and dislike do not exist in the Lord.” Yes, he is beyond conjecture (apratarkyād) because being beyond our logical abilities, he does not have like and dislike (in spite of being the ultimate cause of happiness and distress.) Bhīṣma has said:

na hy asya karhicid rājan pumān veda vidhitsitam

yad vijijñāsayā yuktā muhyanti kavayo ’pi hi

O King! No one can understand the plan of Kṛṣṇa because even those engaged in reasoning and scripture are bewildered by that inquiry. SB 1.9.16

 

“It can be inferred that the Lord gives suffering to me for benefiting the devotees. He desires to increase remembrance of the Lord by increasing the miserable condition of developing devotees, like me, the bull. As well he wants to announce the fame of the highest devotee like you by your punishing Kali.

 

Among the various opinions which is the best? You decide by your intelligence the proper truth (anurūpam), because you are sage among kings (rājarṣi).”  

 

By using the word niścayaḥ (certainty) at the end of the list of opinions, this final opinion should be taken as the correct conclusion according to the Vaiṣṇavas. By saying “among all of them (keṣu)” it is indicated that this idea is rare. The king should consider this (vimṛśa) among the various alternatives. Happiness and distress is not illusory because suffering is actually experienced. Its cause is not the ātmā itself, since the jīva is dependent. The cause is not the planets because they are dependent on movement of time. The cause of suffering and happiness is not karma because it is insentient. Moreover the man of dharma (following the path of the Mīmāṁśakas) has prārabdha and aprārabdha karmas. If so, then their idea that following their path of karma destroys suffering is negated. Svabhāva is not the cause since it is not an exclusive cause. The Lord as the cause is absolute. Bhīṣma has said already that the plan of the Lord however is impossible for everyone to understand.  

 

|| 1.17.21 ||

sūta uvāca

evaṁ dharme pravadati sa samrāḍ dvija-sattamāḥ |

samāhitena manasā vikhedaḥ paryacaṣṭa tam ||



Поделиться:


Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2024-06-27; просмотров: 60; Нарушение авторского права страницы; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

infopedia.su Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. Обратная связь - 216.73.216.156 (0.006 с.)