evamapyupanyāsātpūrvabhāvādavirodhaṃ bādarāyaṇaḥ ..4.4.7.. 


Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!



ЗНАЕТЕ ЛИ ВЫ?

evamapyupanyāsātpūrvabhāvādavirodhaṃ bādarāyaṇaḥ ..4.4.7..

evamapyupanyāsātpūrvabhāvādavirodhaṃ bādarāyaṇaḥ ..4.4.7..

 

Evam, thus. .. Api, oven: though the soul be mere intelligence. … Upanyasat, because of the suggestion, reference: authority of the words of Prajapati. … Purva, of the former (i.e., Jaimini). Bhavat, on account of the existence (of the statement). …. Avirodham, non-contradiction. … Badarayanah, Badarayana, (thinks).

 

7. Even (though the soul be) thus (pure intelligence), yet on account of the authority (of the words of Prajapati), there is no contradiction in the existence of the former (eight qualities also in it). Thus thinks Badarayana. — 544.

 

COMMENTARY

 

Though the essential nature of the soul be pure intelligence, as proved by Audulomi, yet there is no contradiction, if the eight qualities also exist in it. This is the opinion of the Lord Badarayana. Why? Because of the authority. The statement made by Prajapati is an authority for holding that the former opinion held by Jaimini is right; since those qualities also exist in the soul. The settled conclusion, therefore, is that since the Shrutis give unqualified both these statements, — the Brihadaranyaka mentioning that the soul is pure intelligence, and the Chhandogya that it has the eight qualities — and since both these statements are of equal authority, the nature of the freed soul consists of both these sets of qualities. Badarayana approves the view that the soul is «even a mass of intelligence» — that is, unqualified intelligence only. For though it be unqualified (Nirguna) intelligence only, yet there is no contradiction, when it is said to possess the eight qualities also. The word eva «only» used in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (…), «a mass of intelligence only» — does not prevent the soul possessing other attributes also. For the above passage of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad purports to exclude all and every kind of irrationality (Jadatva) from the soul and to teach that the self is self-luminous. Though the Jiva be thus self-luminous, pure intelligence, there is no contradiction if it possesses the eight qualities, known from another equally authoritative text. Thus though a solid salt-crystal be a mass of mere taste, and nothing but taste, yet it has a form, hardness, etc., also, and these qualities do not contradict its being a mass of taste.

Therefore, it follows, that in Mukti, the Jiva manifests as pure intelligence, endowed by the Lord with the eight qualities.

Adhikarana V — The Mukta is a Satya-sankalpa

 

Now the author discusses the question of the Mukta being a Satyasankalpa, one whoso will spontaneously becomes resolved into the accomplished act.

Vishaya: In the Chhandogya Upanishad (VIII., 12.3) it is stated: «He moves about there, laughing, playing, rejoicing, be it with women, or chariots, or relatives».

Doubt: here arises the doubt: Does the soul’s meeting with the relatives and the rest presuppose an effort on its part, or does it come about by its mere willing?

Purvapaksha: The opponent maintains the view that there is effort on the part of the soul. For in this world, even such great persons as kings, etc., who are said to be Satya-sankalpas (those whose wishes are never frustrated but over accomplished), have to exert in order to have their wishes realised. Therefore, the Muktas meet with their relatives by willing, accompanied by some effort to get the will realised.

Siddhanta: This opinion is refuted in the next Sutra.



Поделиться:


Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2024-07-06; просмотров: 55; Нарушение авторского права страницы; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

infopedia.su Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. Обратная связь - 216.73.216.196 (0.005 с.)